Archive for Letters

Clean streets, lower crime rate

The crime rate in Little Rock is higher than it has been in decades and our city is now the 64th top performer in violent crime in the U.S. An average Little Rock citizen has a 1 in 13 chance of being a victim of a theft crime and a 1 in 72 chance of being a victim of a violent crime. Hope is not lost for Little Rock, however, for other cities have faced the same problem.

Clean streets, lower crime rate

The crime rate in Little Rock is higher than it has been in decades and our city is now the 64th top performer in violent crime in the U.S. An average Little Rock citizen has a 1 in 13 chance of being a victim of a theft crime and a 1 in 72 chance of being a victim of a violent crime. Hope is not lost for Little Rock, however, for other cities have faced the same problem. For example, New York City reported a 51 percent decrease of theft and a 72 percent decrease in violent crimes by using a version of the Broken Windows theory. The theory claims that if an area is rundown then it will appear to be lawless and attract negative activity. If Little Rock cleaned up of these rundown areas, then there would be no attraction for the lawless, and in response Little Rock's crime rate would drop significantly. Another result of cleaner streets would be an increase in tourism, spiking the economy of Little Rock and the profits of the small business owners. Not only would the crime rate drop, but all of Little Rock would reap the benefits of cleaner streets.

John Redding

Little Rock

Against 2223

I am not at all surprised that the group supporting [Eureka Springs' equal rights] Ordinance 2223 has had to dig 40 years into a man's history to come up with a talking point. Please note: They are not sticking to the facts. Fact 1: that this ordinance was pushed through at the end of the city council meeting without a fair hearing or time for rebuttal. Fact 2: that state law prohibits cities from passing an ordinance having to do with discrimination. That is under the purview of the state of Arkansas.

They know the law is unenforceable and I would further submit to you that they know they don't have a leg to stand on, so they have engaged in the typical political ploy: completely change the subject so people will stop looking directly at the issue and instead engage in "ain't it awful." This group of people's true agenda is to divide our city into "us" and "them," which is the basic goal of most government offices. Keep raising a ruckus and not look at the facts.

As for Mr. Turner, he needs no defending. If you have to dig 40 years into a man's past to come up with some "dirt" on him, that probably means for the last 40 years he's been doing just fine.

Your paper has served the troublemakers as a divisive tool, which was their goal in the first place.

Pamela Stewart

Eureka Springs

From the web

In response to the Times' April 23 cover story, "What will Eureka do?":

First, I must thank Stephen King for allowing David free access to your literary channeling service and for only requiring a small plug for "The Shining" in payment.

In other words: Wonderful introduction to your insightful article, Mr. Koon! A hook such as this is sometimes necessary in order to lure a Philistine like myself to read an educational piece. I'm now much more informed about the current controversy up in Eureka Springs.

It's also left me grinning like a skeleton at the wheel of a wrecked Packard at the bottom of a hidden ravine somewhere in the Ozark Mountains.

Olphart

Good thing the legislative session is over. Otherwise, the bigot brigade led by Sen. Bart Hester and Rep. Bob Ballinger would be trying to pass a bill banning Bruce Jenner from coming to Arkansas. Small minds from wide gaps in the road trying to tell the rest of us how to live.

How about a vote to ban these two from Eureka Springs and Fayetteville?

philbilly

In response to "A child beaten, slain despite red flags" (April 23):

As a former caseworker this article is hard to read. Caseworkers are not psychic. They have to process investigations with the information available to them. An investigation entails meeting with the reporter, meeting with the child and meeting with the alleged offenders. The investigators see the home. If the worker and their supervisor could not find a reason to substantiate the allegations, then DHS is out of their lives. In some cases they can open what is called a supportive service case where they think the family could benefit from services. If an investigation was properly done and there was an unsubstantiated finding, then DHS is not culpable. Did the investigator search for the parents' names? I do not know. Were there issues with the system not picking up the previous cases? I do not know. The simple fact is this: Caseworkers are underpaid, overworked and have a very high turnover/burn-out rate. Caseworkers take the brunt of the abuse from the parents, kids, foster parents, judges and the system in general. We need less blaming DHS and more overhauling the system so cases don't fall through the cracks and children and families can get the services they need.

oneofthemdamnlesbians

Once a person has had a child removed from his or her custody for abuse, especially six confirmed physical and sexual abuse reports, then part of the punishment immediately should be to tie their tubes or give them a vasectomy. I know someone above said people can change, however, this man abused two sets of children and was allowed to have more babies in order to abuse them. Totally disgusting. Children need advocates. If people can't be good parents, then I don't think they should physically be capable of producing children. This is ridiculous. We are in the same state and the system failed. As the older son said, so much could have been done. We have an overpopulation problem on this earth. The last thing we need is more deviant people reproducing.

thetruthhurts

[ Subscribe to the comments on this story ]

In-prison visits important

Thank you for writing about the existing and the looming video visitation services for families of the incarcerated in our state's jails and prisons.

In-prison visits important

Thank you for writing about the existing and the looming video visitation services for families of the incarcerated in our state's jails and prisons. I have feared this technology and its potential for harm ever since the Supreme Court ruled that prisoners have no rights to visits, not even by their children (Bazetta v. Overton case). Certainly, in-person visits can be costly, providing security for the visits, but once more, the costs are greatly offset by the value of an in-person visit with the children and most visits serve as motivations for the incarcerated parent to abide by the rules and maintain positive behavior. I have talked with wardens in 42 prisons and jails in 14 states that have created more child-friendly visits. They often report that the culture of their facilities is enhanced with more cooperation and positive reactions.

Again, the importance of the parent-child visits allows the maintenance of the relationship of the parent and child, as most parents will be home during their child's minor years. A video visit for 30 minutes in a fee-for-service session does very little to improve the relationship. There are cases when video visits are valuable: I am sure the families of our deployed soldiers, as well as prisoners and their families, who are separated by hundreds of miles, are grateful for video visits. But that is not the case in Arkansas.

I was hopeful that our state prison board and directors would not pursue video visiting, as the funds could be better used for our families by providing funding to help with travel and overnight stays rather than resorting to this sort of poor contact. The Arkansas Department of Correction has a history of intermittent efforts to become child-friendlier, but the agency and the board have recently been more neglectful of the consideration of the children's needs. There is not a uniform policy to support parent-child contact. Indeed, there are many ill-informed judges, caseworkers, therapists and caregivers who oppose children visiting with their incarcerated parents. Their positions violate research and the direct experiences of the children who want to visit. Indeed, it would have been helpful if the board had talked with family members about the implementation of video visits in our prisons, to insure their perspective was considered.

In our recent survey of families of the incarcerated whom we serve now or have served in the past more than 90 percent of 232 caregivers and youth found video visiting as unsatisfactory compared to a direct visit, either through the window with a phone or a direct contact visit. Many also felt fearful that such video visits would replace a contact visit, something implied in ADC spokesperson Cathy Frye's comments to the Times.

We will all benefit from sustaining these families, not destroying them.

Dee Ann Newell

Arkansas Voices for the Children Left Behind

From the web

In response to last week's cover story, "A killing in Pocahontas":

Wow! Great story.

The national media offered this tale as an emblem of Southern Grotesque? That might be an understatement. Even the names are perfect: Bob Sam Castleman. His girlfriend, Becky Spray. B.S.'s son had a girlfriend named "Fanci."

My grandfather, who often mixed his metaphors, had a saying for a sad and sordid account such as this. He always said that a snake in a box is worth two in the grass.

Again, good job.

Where does the Times get all these talented writers?

Olphart

The irony of this story is that the son, who the father was trying to protect, eventually "turned" on his father in an effort to get a lighter sentence. I've always heard there is no honor among thieves and drug dealers, and this story proves it!

RYD

I grew up in Dalton, just outside of Pocahontas. When I was still young, my family moved to Paragould, two weeks after my best friend, at the time, Felicia Elliot's family had been murdered and she had gone missing. I still visited there a few times a year until I moved to Idaho. I was too young to know about the Perkins case, but I do remember the building he lived in. But I can say with absolute certainty that Pocahontas is a cancer on society as a whole. Very few decent people still live there. It has become a melting pot for drug dealers, drug abusers, thieves, murderers, and the like.

Cody James Bradford

In response to "New anti-choice laws in Arkansas pose danger to women":

The ACLU of Arkansas kept a very low profile this session for one reason: to help those who wanted to do the right thing do it.

So, while we were hardly visible on many bills, we quietly but assiduously fought these measures that endanger women's health and interfere in their most private, personal decisions. Our efforts, and those of intelligent, reasonable and compassionate legislators on both sides of the aisle who are sick to death of these political score-keeping measures, whose sole purpose is to be used as ammunition in political races, were stymied by the overwhelming ability of certain groups to threaten withdrawal of support from and/or antagonism to the reelection campaigns of those who ended up feeling they "had" to vote for the bills — and you see the result. The left, middle and right were overwhelmed by the extremists.

Somebody has to stand up against this truly loud and vindictive minority. We're not stupid. We know this is not about protecting women.

When those who would do the right thing by women and their families are given the same support, we'll see a different outcome. The ACLU and Planned Parenthood and others will do our part to fight these oppressive measures; but the silent majority is going to have to rev up its game and get a lot louder and a lot more involved — around the state more than in good old progressive Little Rock — to put the oppressive, backward-leaning minority back it where it belongs.

C'mon Arkansas! Stand up and fight for your state!

Rita Sklar

In response to Gene Lyons' April 16 column, "The Obama Doctrine":

Fact of the matter is that Obama is worse than Chamberlain, because Iran is weak, the sanctions are hurting, yet Obama wants to removed sanctions before any proof of Iranian complaisance. This is foolish since Iran has not hesitated to break every single nuclear inspection treaty it was obligated to follow.

Every single one. Not once or twice, but every single time. Let that sink in for a bit. Since Obama has decided, unilaterally, to make buddy buddy with the Castro regime, FARC, which is an armed branch of Castro's terrorist structure, attacked military bases less than a day after Obama's announcement. Iran has supported other terrorist activities, such as Yemen. More egg on Obama's face.

Nobody worries about a nuclear Israel because the Israeli nuclear program is entirely for defensive purposes, where as the only reason Iran wants nuclear weapons is to exterminate Israel. Yet Obama touts his plans as if Iran is playing straight. Iran does not care if it gets nuked by Israel in retaliation. Even the Saudis are shopping around with Pakistan because they sure don't want Iran to be a nuclear power, and their only viable alternative to trusting Obama is to create a nuclear stockpile of their own.

Obama talks a good game, but his actions are anything but strong.

Steven E

[ Subscribe to the comments on this story ]

Mindless cattle

Why only two choices at the polls in this country? I'll tell you why. Because the real power structures within the Republicans and Democrats are engaged in an operation designed to keep us mindless cattle at each other's throats while they rob us blind.

Mindless cattle

Why only two choices at the polls in this country? I'll tell you why. Because the real power structures within the Republicans and Democrats are engaged in an operation designed to keep us mindless cattle at each other's throats while they rob us blind. They have a vested interest in keeping us locked in a battle of words over moral issues while ignoring the economy. While we argue over same-sex marriage and abortion, the gap between production and income grows wider everyday. As CEOs and shareholders gain more power and wealth, the rest of us obsess over whether or not we should kill prisoners. It's time to wake up, folks. Capitalism is destroying us. It's time to remind our leaders/overlords they can be replaced.

Richard Hutson

Rose Bud

Another monument

Now that we're going to be blessed with a monument on the Capitol grounds celebrating words from the old Jewish part of the Bible, I believe that it's only fair that we also have a monument celebrating something from the New Testament, the Christian part of the same book.

I suggest that the other monument celebrate the Sermon on the Mount, especially the Beatitudes, the very words spoken by Jesus himself.

No one but a real Jesus hater would oppose that second monument.

Brent Cater

Clarksville

From the web:

On last week's cover story by Leslie Newell Peacock, "Why and how you got screwed by the 90th General Assembly":

Thanks. Great concise reminder of all the harms that the greedy self-aggrandizing public "servants" brought us this session.

Ark7788

Don't forget the quiet passing of an act that totally restructures state government, creating 10 executive level top pay cabinet members. I am amazed this hasn't received more publicity. It in essence builds a much bigger government.

Clem Hooten

Worst Arkansas Legislative Session EVER!

However, stayed tuned, because I suspect this is only the beginning since we passed a Constitutional Amendment that not only increased the salaries but also extended the terms of these hateful, self-centered and small minded "public servants."

In just a little over 3 months, the Teapublibans managed to reverse the last 50 years here in Darkansas.

RYD

Is there a short catchphrase or hashtag to rally against this wave? I am looking for something short to scribble on a T-shirt. "Equality Arkansas" or #EqualityArkansas seems to have a nice touch, but I want something that is more inclusive of the poor who got shafted this session.

jj

On last week's story by Benjamin Hardy, "What HB 1228 was really about":

Asa never planned to issue an executive order. He just didn't want to look as bad as the Indiana governor. Now that the mics and lights are off, Asa is Asa.

r5ander

On Max Brantley's column, "How bad was the 90th Arkansas General Assembly?"

You've been unhappy about how things are done here for years. Maybe it's time to move to the coast.

Doug Shinn

President Obama refuses to lower taxes to create jobs and growth, so the responsibility falls to the states. But seriously, anyone who has witnessed the failure of the stimulus package, that was only capable of generating two years growth and still argues for the Keynesian economic recovery model, is lacking in economic analysis skills.

Simply put: An across-the-board tax cut at the federal level would place a massive infusion of cash into the economy through the hands of businesses that can create jobs and into the hands of consumers who can purchase goods and services. A huge psychological effect occurs in the minds of job creators that doesn't occur following a government stimulus. In the absence of a federal income tax cut, then state income tax reductions can be effective, i.e. Texas and Florida that don't have any income taxes and whose economies are very strong.

In every instance in which the policy was implemented the economy rocketed out of recession with a 7 percent or greater post-recession growth rate, generating a self-sustaining recovery for 5 to 7 years. Obama's government stimulus was only capable of generating a 5 percent post-recession quarter growth rate and a two-year recovery. By 2010 the Federal Reserve had to intervene to keep the economy afloat by holding interest rates at zero and expanding the money supply to purchase T-bills private investors didn't want.

In a recovery, both short-term and long-term unemployment decline in tandem. That didn't happen following the stimulus package. Long-term unemployment remains elevated at over 11 percent. You can label an across-the-board tax cut as only for the rich, but it happens to be the only way to create enough jobs and economic growth for any socioeconomic class to feel economically secure and that they are providing for their families, and to propel the economy for an extended recovery.

As for an state Earned Income Tax Credit for low-income workers: Why don't the Democrats try targeting it toward Medical Savings Accounts or other benefit rather than as a cash payout that can be spent in foolish ways. Obamacare was so poorly conceived with unsustainable cost increases that it can't last much longer and these workers could benefit greatly from a modest and affordable market-oriented insurance plan.

Thomas Pope

[ Subscribe to the comments on this story ]

An Observer worth framing

The Observer really got his (her) dander up in the April 2 edition and told it like it is! Hallelujah and Amen! I'm framing this column!

An Observer worth framing

The Observer really got his (her) dander up in the April 2 edition and told it like it is! Hallelujah and Amen! I'm framing this column!

Lucy Rhodes

Little Rock

Deciding whom to serve

Should business people and churches vet everyone they serve? What about murderers, sex offenders, Senate adulterers, child rapists and child rehomers? If a black, disabled, gay person wanted to order a wedding cake, which exclusion would the business use? Better be careful — one of these minorities is open to all and you just might join the hated and discriminated-against minority if you live long enough. I've seen it.

Who are they going to hate and exclude next? It could be you!

(Written in honor of a friend who is gay and our son, who is "disabled.")

Susan Nygaard Keith

Magnolia

From the web

About the 90th General Assembly's access to low-cost, state-subsidized apartments:

A couple more legislative sessions like this last one and they'll all have luxury suites for free at the Capital Hotel. ... hot and cold running hookers, too, child exorcisms paid by the state, pictures of Jesus on state bonds, expense accounts of $1 million! And undisclosed locations where the LGBTs can be roasted like June bugs in a camp fire! 

The Red Team has been waiting almost 145 years to get back into power and line their nests like no tomorrow! They have to blow it out enough to last another 145 years, the next time Arkansas voters are stupid enough to vote them in again.

It's "Supermarket Sweep!" It's "Who Wants To Be a Millionaire!" It's the Powerball Lottery that only hits Republicans every 150 years or so! Grab with both hands and teach yer ass to clinch harder! Oink oink oink oink!

Death by inches

On an Arkansas Blog post about Gov. Asa Hutchinson's backing off an executive order to protect LGBT Arkansans:

I predict within the next one to six years, hundreds and hundreds (maybe thousands) of talented queer people of ALL ages, rich and poor, will leave the state. And with them will go their talented friends. Talented in business, art, music, whatever. The Arkansas "brain drain" has been and will be greatly accelerated.

Some in the gay community have been encouraging other gay people to "stay and fight." But that old argument isn't working much anymore. If we stay and fight, what do we win? I mean, just look around: boarded up buildings, miles and miles of poor farm ground, acres of leaky house trailers, the reputation of worst state in the Union, the uneducated who like it that way, Ballinger-Hutchinson-Huckabee-Hester, and a Walmart life making minimum wage or just above it.

Nope. Not this time. Way too many gay people and gay friendlies are making plans. Resumes have been flying from Arkansas like leaves from autumn trees. "Let 'em have it!" has become the new "California or Bust." There ARE greener fields for the open-minded where there's no fight involved. Just step in and get your share. The rest here are too dumb to know they're suffering.

"Let 'em have it!"

Spunkrat

Hustle up here from Austin, Seth, and talk your daddy into doing right.

Durango

Coward.

Yellowdogdaughter

In response to an item on the Arkansas Blog noting that a Methodist church was excluded from Eureka's Easter Parade because it wanted to carry a sign saying "Jesus Loves All":

The stain of discrimination is slowly destroying the church's influence in this country. They wave a piece of shit and tell us it's a bar of gold.

Am sure that there's a missing section in the Bible where Jesus has to deal with such self-righteous haters. It, too, would have a very short verse commenting on Jesus' reaction to this desecration of his message: "Jesus puked."

Jake da Snake

Well, with the passage of time (approx. 25 minutes) I think I understand the parade official's logic. I mean why would anyone want to allow the United Methodist Church to participate in a parade about Jesus?

The only thing that allows me to state this is "Think and let think." — John Wesley, 1703-1791.

Maxifer

Besides allowing gay people to escape shunning and stoning, Methodists also ordain women, baptize babies and support universal health care. Who needs more proof they are demonic?

Paying Top Dollar for Legislators

In response to reporting on the Arkansas Blog that Josh Duggar, of the multitudinous Dugger clan, and his wife have more than $13,000 in state tax liens dating back to 2009:

When you're in the throes of busily filling your quiver you're liable to like totally forget you're screwing Uncle Sam, too. Not in a gay way, 'cause you're also like totally fighting THOSE people day and night in between quivering. But I like totally don't understand lying about settling your debts because that's un-Christian and stuff. Sounds like a he-said she-just-lay-there type situation or something, bless his heart.

Norma Bates

In response to an Arkansas Blog post on state Treasurer Dennis Milligan's issuing coins and key chains with his likeness on them:

If Milligan wants to give trinkets away, I have no problem with him using his own money, but if this is our tax money being used to buy cheap Chinese junk with his likeness on them, the order needs to be FOIed to see if we are getting near felony levels for misuse of state monies. Where are the Tea Party people on this misuse of taxpayer money, or is it OK because he is one?

couldn't be better

[ Subscribe to the comments on this story ]

Tom Cotton and American fascism

Tragically, many Americans unknowingly support fascism. Many prominent leaders are de facto fascists and their followers are clueless.

Tom Cotton and American fascism

Tragically, many Americans unknowingly support fascism. Many prominent leaders are de facto fascists and their followers are clueless. History teachers generally fail us. Responsible teachers would require that every student read FDR's Vice President Henry Wallace's 1944 New York Times article titled, "The Danger of American Fascism." Among other important characteristics, Wallace explains American fascism here:

"The American fascist would prefer ... to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power. ... If we define an American fascist as one who in case of conflict puts money and power ahead of human beings, then there are undoubtedly several million fascists in the United States."

FDR also said "... the liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism — ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power."  According to these definitions, it is very safe to say American fascism has grown immensely, both in leadership and unwitting followers.

Most directly, politicians and the Supreme Court are attacking democracy, unleashing floods of corrupting money in elections, and supporting policies that advance and protect concentrations of wealth and power. Simply put, this is building fascism. They also twist truth constantly to manipulate gullible minds.  Propaganda and financial election controls are the keys to their car. Fox News, right-wing radio and right-wing religion are the primary engine, but all mainstream media is partially responsible, too.

The Koch brothers are exemplary fascist shadow rulers who would destroy everything we hold dear in the name of false "liberty." Tom Cotton, the darling of the Kochs, Wall Street and the Israel Lobby, is the poster boy of American fascism. If the Kochs were 11-year old girls, Tom would be their Justin Bieber. Virtually all the policies this ilk supports are in the interest of the richest few.

Writing for the Harvard Crimson, younger Tom wrote, "The only real way to solve our current problems is to deregulate campaign financing ... (and) sharply increase contribution limits or eliminate them altogether ... ." This is in complete harmony with David Koch's 1980 Libertarian campaign platform for vice president. In addition to abolishing Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, minimum wage and everything else that helps the elderly, sick and poor, Koch stated, "We urge the repeal of federal campaign finance laws."

The Kochs and lapdog Tom got their wish with the Supreme Court's decisions in Citizens United and McCutcheon. These decisions build on jurisprudence that is sulfuric acid to self-government.  In addition to cases giving corporations constitutional rights under corporate personhood dating back to Santa Clara in 1886, the landmark 1976 Buckley decision held that money is speech.

Now, taken altogether, the Supreme Court is saying corporations and the ultra-rich have free speech protections to spend unlimited amounts of money to buy candidates, elections and ultimately the laws. It is legalized bribery and corruption. Unfortunately, the poor mice cannot $peak beyond a squeak, while the wealthy banshees scream at a million decibels on every TV channel.

Now, avalanches of money are suffocating our elections to the point that a 2014 Princeton study concluded America is no longer a democracy.  After examining data from 1,800 policy initiatives between 1981 and 2002, researchers Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page found that the richest few control the country in an oligarchy.

Gilens and Page write: "The central point that emerges from our research is that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence."

There is one last vestige of democracy holding back complete oligarchy: what remains of the Bill of Rights, after being undermined by Dubya and Obama's terror war. Our votes for puppets may not matter as much as money, but we still have First Amendment protections of actual speech, press, religion and assembly.

Let us remember the words of Woody Guthrie, "... You fascists may be surprised, people in this world are getting organized ... . All you fascists bound to lose."

Abel Tomlinson

Fayetteville

Open letter to the governor

House Bill 1228 and the others like it that have come out of this legislative session are hate-filled and venomous attacks on a portion of citizens of the State of Arkansas. How in good conscience can you say to LGBT constituents that they don't matter? I understand the idle nature of this and other laws. Gov. Hutchinson, you and I both know they will never be upheld by the Supreme Court.  But you and your colleagues in the legislature can look like you're tough on the issue. You and I are both intelligent enough, and politically savvy enough, to realize that this is a hollow gesture.  But governor, to the young person struggling daily to accept his or her sexuality,  these don't seem like empty words. A 16-year-old that is coming of age and not understanding the hormonal signals that are going on in his or her body hears your words loud and clear. You sir, an authority in our state, someone that people look up to and aspire to be like, have said to this young person that he or she is inherently flawed. It's because of actions like these, that gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered Americans are almost twice as likely as their straight counterparts to commit suicide. Make no mistake governor, if you sign this bill, or refuse to act, then you will have very real blood on your hands.  That's not something I could live with. I am of the opinion that all citizens in this great state deserve the same shot in life.

Michael Nickerson

[ Subscribe to the comments on this story ]

A Harvard man

Like Tom Cotton, I have served in a war. I have four medals, none terribly important, to show for it. Perhaps he has more.

A Harvard man

Like Tom Cotton, I have served in a war. I have four medals, none terribly important, to show for it. Perhaps he has more.

Like Tom Cotton, I have the distinction of having a degree from Harvard (HBS '58). Unlike him I cannot claim to be "a Harvard Man." That distinction goes only to graduates of the college.

I do have a good friend, however, a fellow naval officer, an important Republican (or at least he has been), who is "a Harvard Man." I hope he will not chastise me for sharing a recent email:

"Would it surprise you when I say that your new senator is a despicable piece of shit? It's too bad that Harvard doesn't revoke degrees. When I was an undergraduate, there was a common belief that not only can you be expelled but, in really bad cases, you could be expunged. All record of your existence at the college would be erased. Of course, that would not be possible now, if it ever was."

To expunge our junior senator would only bolster his bona fides for the Arkansas voters who voted against their self-interest to elect him. But it would make some of us in the Harvard community feel good.

"Support our troops?" Yes. Support someone who quite obviously joined the Army in order to add to his resume when running for election? No.

Since 1636, graduates of Harvard have aimed to advance the cause of freedom and republicanism (small "r") in America, some liberal, some conservative. Preserve us from one who may destroy the Republic. Arkansas deserves better.

Edward Wooten

Little Rock

An open letter to Tom Cotton

Congratulations on your election to the Senate of the United States of America. You may run for president someday, but I want to point out to you that you are not currently the president.

When you were elected I had no doubt you would embarrass the state of Arkansas, but I had no idea it would be this soon or that your actions would be so injurious to the security, power and prestige of the United States of America. Your unprecedented correspondence with the leaders of the nation of Iran is the most astonishing thing I have seen a member of Congress do. I am 65 years old and have seen a lot.

Not only are you wrong about your interpretation of the Constitution of the United States, you seem to be ignorant that what you did was illegal. By now I am sure you have had to read up on the particulars of the Logan Act, which criminalizes the actions of persons who attempt in any way to negotiate or effect the negotiations of the duly authorized president with other nations. In another copy of this letter, I am urging Attorney General Holder and his successor to fully investigate whether you and the 46 other Republican senators can be charged with the crime.

Your action in this matter is beyond arrogant. It is reckless, it undermines this and every future president by showing that this nation is no longer unified when it comes to negotiating agreements and treaties. It should not have required knowledge of the Logan Act for you to know that what you did was inherently wrong and un-American.

I have no hope or expectation that you will retract your actions. I do hope that the other members of Congress come to appreciate your reckless ambition and see it for what it is, so that you are never able to undermine this nation again for the remainder of what I hope is your final term in office. I also hope the Department of Justice will do its job.

Keith Jones

Little Rock

Truth and abuse

I would like to make a few comments regarding Arkansas Times' coverage of the Justin Harris adoption story. This kind of story is heartbreaking, complicated and (aside from being high profile) not uncommon. I've worked more than 30 years as a therapist with abused children and see several cases each year where many months may go by before those involved begin to get a clear understanding of "what really happened." Sometimes things never become clear — typically as a result of little reliable information, too many conflicting stories and too much ambiguity. These cases always bring up strong unpleasant emotions and immediate urges to ease the resulting discomfort by quickly finding out what is "true" and "doing something." Simplifying things and quickly throwing in our lot on one side or the other brings some comfort. When we feel we have the truth we can confidently blast away at those on the other side who got it all wrong. Three or 12 months later more "facts" come out and, oops, it turns out we had it all wrong. I've been through this process dozens of times with my clinical cases and find myself going through it again as I follow coverage of this Harris adoption story.

What I find very pleasing, however, is the quality of journalism in the Arkansas Times. It is wonderful! This depth of coverage with an impartial tone is welcome and rare. The fourth estate at its best. Kudos to Benjamin Hardy! It is this kind of reporting that can, and I hope will, bring about real change that results in better care for the kids in our state's child protection system. There is a need for levelheaded policy discussions about the issues raised in these articles and some meaningful change, not just rolling of heads and passing of more knee-jerk laws.

Jim Harper

Little Rock

Conservatism throughout history

The conservative mentality has a long history of being wrong and having to change its position, at least outwardly, in the face of scientific and social change. Consider the fact that Earth was once believed to be flat. Conservative church leaders went so far as to force Galileo to recant his findings on the issue or face trial for "heresy." A conservative church also thought once that mental illness was the work of the devil and disease epidemics were God's way of punishing wicked people for their sins. There was once a time when conservatives used the Bible to justify slavery, as well as the oppression of women. In all these instances conservatives have had to admit being wrong and change their stances. One might think a history of getting it wrong would make conservatives more cautious about continuing to apply the same mentality in more recent times, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Today's conservatives, primarily mainstream Republicans and Tea Party types, are still using the same worn-out arguments to justify their positions on issues like same-sex marriage, abortion, the death penalty, poverty and the "War on Drugs." If conservatives have been wrong so often in the past, why still hold on to this archaic approach? Is it possible that today's conservatives may have to change their stances on these hot-button issues? With most of the world, including a majority of Americans whether conservatives will admit it or not, becoming more progressive, they must change with the times. If not they will risk becoming a despised minority within their own country, and the GOP will be added to the list of failed political parties such as Whigs and Federalists.

Richard Hutson

Rose Bud

[ Subscribe to the comments on this story ]

Brewing for this fight

Historically, Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen has brewed for every First Amendment fight he can generate. His proclivity for social and political commentary as a judge has always been his platform. Perhaps he does not believe any other platform would be available to him with as much credibility and notoriety. In any event, the current controversy is made to order for him.

Brewing for this fight

Historically, Circuit Judge Wendell Griffen has brewed for every First Amendment fight he can generate. His proclivity for social and political commentary as a judge has always been his platform. Perhaps he does not believe any other platform would be available to him with as much credibility and notoriety. In any event, the current controversy is made to order for him.

Having read his order, it seems to me he has missed the point and misstated the ethical standards he is bound to observe. He thinks Justice Antonin Scalia has paved his way to say whatever he wants and never disqualify unless the case is already filed in his court and he has announced a decision before the case is even tried.

His public letter published on Jan. 28 was his First Amendment right, however unseemly it may be for a judge to utter. However, it is laughable for him to conclude that it was not foreseeable that a lawsuit would be filed in Pulaski County if state takeover occurred. Equally laughable is his conclusion that he did not prejudge the legality (no credible evidence, etc.) or propriety of such a takeover in his Jan. 28 statement.

I don't question his conclusion that both the school district's poor history and the present takeover is tainted with abject racism. The presence or absence of racism is not the issue. The real issue is whether his statements have conveyed the appearance that he cannot be impartial in weighing the evidence and following the law. His Jan. 28 statement must be evaluated as a body of work to determine its impact on appearances. For him to split hairs and say his statement does not expressly commit him to a legal result is sophistry.

Scalia only said that a state cannot prohibit an elected judge from publicly commenting on social and political issues (not just one case)during the course of a political campaign. That decision also indicated that the cure for any appearance of impartiality for those statements is for the judge to disqualify, even if not because of an actual expressed bias. Appearances do matter.

In my opinion Griffen wants this fight. He has waited a long time for a fight like this, and it will accomplish nothing. Any other judge would have immediately disqualified from the case assignment under the present circumstances and not waited for a party to ask for it. And rightfully so. Such is the fallout from a judge commenting on the social and political events of the day.

David Stewart

Fayetteville

Fight for public school

I have taught in the public schools for 13 years. I am the son and grandson of public school teachers. My love and affection for a free and fair public education system runs deep. At this moment in time I fear public education is at a dangerous crossroads. The same corruption that has befallen our political system and our economic system is now threatening to infect our schools. I understand why moderates turn from politics and focus on their own lives. Politics is an unseemly business where integrity goes to die and self-interest and greed thrive. I understand how moderates can feel a sense of disenfranchisement from our elected officials. However, moderates, as I write this, there has been a systematic attack on our public education system.

Our country was founded on the idea of advanced citizenship. Advanced citizenship only works when "we the people" can benefit from a robust and strong public education system. Schools are held in public trust and should remain in the public trust. Once the public becomes divested of public education we truly will be a nation of individuals. We will lose the most fundamental of American principles, that out of one comes many.

To protect a core American value, free and public education, we must realize that no right has been won, no victory celebrated without the unified voices of American citizens challenging the status quo. Today, that status quo is represented by state legislators who have been bought and paid for by lobbyists from Washington, D.C. We must reclaim our constitutional authority over our elected officials and hold them accountable to the great American idea of public education. It was American theologian Reinhold Niebuhr who reminded us that man is moral, while groups are immoral. The protection against immoral groups is a free and public education. We must demand our elected officials protect our public education from the self-interest and greed of the private sector. Our educational system should not be a financial bottom-line industry. Public education should be held in the public trust, and ensure our children have every opportunity to achieve their American dream.

Public education is sick. However, turning over our children to for-profit industry is not the cure. The cure can be found in our capacity to love. We must remember what is great about America, and what makes us the United States of America. Our communal spirit, the spirit that reaches out to the weary and beaten traveler and welcomes them back into community. That is the spirit that we must embrace. Education is our secret weapon. It can cure society's ills, mend its broken relationships, but only if all members of society engage in the process. Public education is public because we all benefit from it or we can all suffer if we turn it into a for-profit bottom-line industry.

I want to call on all my brothers and sisters who feel disconnected, ignored or disenfranchised by the political system to not sell yourself short, to speak up and defend the great public trust we have been given, the education of our children.

Adam Kirby Little Rock

[ Subscribe to the comments on this story ]

It is evil, Rep. Harris

Harris' conclusion is absolutely correct, but it has nothing to do with the article. It IS evil. You don't like your new kids which you've adopted? Well just give 'em away to somebody. Give them to a potential sex abuser. I'll give Harris the benefit of the doubt on this because, at the time, he might not have known this could happen. Maybe, maybe not.

From the web

Online comments from readers on last week's cover story on state Rep. Justin Harris' rehoming of his adopted girls to a man who turned out to be a pedophile:

It is evil, Rep. Harris

"In February, the Arkansas Times asked Rep. Harris to comment on the case and explain what became of the girls he and his wife had adopted. He refused, and stated that the Times was attempting to 'smear' him. 'It's evil,' he said, becoming visibly upset."

Harris' conclusion is absolutely correct, but it has nothing to do with the article. It IS evil. You don't like your new kids which you've adopted? Well just give 'em away to somebody. Give them to a potential sex abuser. I'll give Harris the benefit of the doubt on this because, at the time, he might not have known this could happen. Maybe, maybe not. Harris has some questions he needs to answer about precisely why Francis was fired. In other words, what did Harris know and when did he know it? Was there more to this than Francis' punctuality?

Either way, Harris shouldn't be eligible to serve on any public body or in any civic capacity. Giving your unwanted children away to somebody is despicable according to anybody's religious beliefs whether it's technically illegal or not. Add to that, Harris is always putting himself up as a paragon of "Christian" virtue — quoting scripture to the Times for example. Obviously, a righteous man such as he would not make a decision such as "rehoming" your children without a lot of prayer. They all say this, all the time. So who's he gonna blame for the tragedy which followed? God? Probably not. Justin Harris? CERTAINLY not. 

Well, who does that leave? I guess that leaves the Arkansas Times for revealing the story. Short of a libel lawsuit, he can't do anything about that. So who will he punish, who will he lash out out [at] — other than liberals in general? Everybody needs to pay close attention to what happens at DHS. They appear to be the main one in the line of fire.

Let's also watch for who defends him in state government. The voters might catch on some day ...

Olphart

DHS secrecy

There are lots of problems with this matter. The news media can't adequately investigate what happened after the adoption because the court case file is sealed and not available to the press or the general public.

DHS will be hesitant to investigate this because they could easily end up with a lot of egg on their face and because Justin Harris is an incumbent House member.

I'm wondering if the adoption was subsidized by the state? If so, did the subsidy continue after the adoption and did Justin Harris and his wife continue to receive those subsidy payments after they no longer had physical custody of the children? If so, there could be some criminal fraud involved there. Some of those subsidy funds are federal dollars, so maybe the state needs to ask the feds to help investigate this matter.

I agree, Benjamin Hardy has done a good job here, but I think he's just found the tip of the iceberg so far. I'd be willing to bet a large sum of money there's a heck of a lot more to this story that may never see the light of day.

What we do know at this point is that Justin Harris and his wife in effect abandoned those children they had adopted. At least one of those children was sexually abused and will now have to live with the effects of that for the rest of her life.

Yes Justin Harris, there is something evil about this. I would suggest you will see it along with a Teapubliban hypocrite every time you look into a mirror.

RYD

Pets treated better

Some pet rescue organizations take adoption more seriously than our state laws do.

When children are legally adopted as these children were, that means you are their Mom and Dad (or Mom and Mom or Dad and Dad as may be the case in more enlightened places). You can't walk away from that morally even if you can legally.

Years ago, acquaintances in California adopted a brother and sister, aged 4 and 6. The adoption agency had not disclosed how severely abused the children had been nor the psychological damage they bore as a result of that abuse. My friends, who were not particularly religious, never faltered. The next 15 years of their lives were a living hell. THEY NEVER GAVE UP. 

If Justin and Marsha Harris ran a kennel, I would not board my three furry best friends with them! If this is an example of their attitudes toward children, imagine their attitude toward animals.

The Outlier

B.S.

Threats of possible abandonment charges? 

What utter bullshit. Is that why they were forced to continue cashing checks from the state? 

They can hire an attorney to defend abandoning those babies by rehoming them, but they couldn't stand up to "threats of abandonment charges" from the state? 

Dear Mr. and Mrs. Harris — This is not about you. THIS IS NOT ABOUT YOU. It's about those little girls, but then it was never about those little girls with y'all, was it? It was about you and how wonderful it was supposed to make you look by filling your quiver. 

Time to resign, dude. Get it over with. You're digging yourself in deeper with every breath you take. Threats of charges over abandonment don't happen when you try and work with DHS, so the only explanation is that you did not want to work things out. 

Vanessa

[ Subscribe to the comments on this story ]

Conway takes positive step

I couldn't be more proud of the six Conway City Council members who voted for the city ordinance extending anti-discrimination protections to city of Conway employees.

Conway takes positive step

I couldn't be more proud of the six Conway City Council members who voted for the city ordinance extending anti-discrimination protections to city of Conway employees. After sitting through the public hearing portion and rising to speak in favor of the ordinance, I continue to be struck by the amount of sheer ignorance and intolerance of so many in that courthouse, including council members Mark Ledbetter and Mary Smith. Those in opposition to the ordinance are simply devoid of any logical argument against extending these protections to the LGBT community.

After reflecting on the public hearing on the matter, I would like to respond to the sometimes incoherent, fallacy-filled rhetoric of those opposed. Time and time again, the opponents presented their side using four completely unfounded and, in some cases, scientifically disproven fallacies.

The idea that the city of Conway should not extend anti-discrimination protections because of religious reasons has no place in governmental policies. Those who say that it should be a factor cannot seem to realize that the very idea of the separation of church and state serves to protect their views as much as those who have other beliefs. Propagating policy based on religious beliefs is a dangerous and delusional endeavor. Christ said nothing about homosexuality, but He did say to love your neighbor as you love yourself.

I am continually baffled to see those using Christ as their reason to oppose viewing people who are different as less than human or deserving of fewer rights. This ideology flies in the face of Christ's teachings. To call yourself a Christian and then oppose offering equal protection from discrimination to the LGBT community is the epitome of hypocrisy. By opposing this ordinance on religious grounds, you are saying that Christ Himself would believe that it is fair to fire someone based on the fact that they are gay. If you believe that to be true, you need to consider adopting a non-Christian religious philosophy, because only a twisted rationale can reconcile such a ridiculous idea that we all know Jesus Himself would disavow.

Regarding those who hold on to the belief that homosexuality is a choice, I imagine no amount of scientific evidence will be able to change your mind. The only question I have for that false assumption is to ask, "When did you choose to be straight?" It seems to me that making the conscious choice to be gay or straight should be a celebrated day in life — like a Jewish boy's bar mitzvah. There should be gifts, cake and the big reveal for the audience of the sexual path you have "chosen" to undertake. The simple fact is that homosexuality is not a choice. I can point to countless studies by reputable organizations like the American Psychological Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Adolescence, and the American Journal of Sociology that provide significant evidence that no "choice" is ever made to be straight or gay.

The "slippery-slope" fallacy is a staple of those with little evidence to support their assertions. I heard numerous opponents state that this is "opening a door" to further problems (I'm not sure what door or how). This ordinance will lead to "lawsuits" that could bankrupt our city, an assertion made by the incomparable and incompetent Sen. Jason Rapert. This ordinance will even lead to naked gay men in a public bathroom! This type of logical fallacy is a tactic used by the weaponless, a form of fear-mongering in a desperate attempt to scare people into supporting a morally reprehensible and ultimately untenable position.

One citizen took umbrage to my assertion that this ordinance is not a slippery slope by bringing up a previous ordinance regarding the sale of alcohol. He asserts that the people of Conway were told that the licensing of alcohol sales to certain restaurants wasn't a slippery slope and that "now, there are bars in Conway!" Oh no! Remember that time when the sale of alcohol plummeted Conway into a deep economic recession? Remember that time when alcohol killed hundreds of Conway residents? Remember that time when alcohol led to prostitution and the dramatic increase in robbery? Me neither. Scare tactics are used when that is all they have. Let's just stop with the hyperbole and view this ordinance for what it really is — the acceptance of the LGBT community as members of humanity.

This is a minute step toward the type of statement that the LGBT community really needs. This is but a drop of water to a raging river. Those that oppose LGBT rights are indeed afraid, for they see the writing on the wall. This country is rightly heading to the just decision that all men and women are created equal. And as such, they deserve the respect of the citizens with whom they share their lives. As American citizens, they deserve equal protection under the law. Regardless of the opposition's deeply held convictions or beliefs, I have faith that true virtue will triumph over those misguided souls who cling to the idea that their citizenship is somehow more valuable than another's.

Jim Harris Conway

Almost funny

The Arkansas legislature seems to be off to a great start in fulfilling its regressive agenda. Anti-equal rights, anti-vaccination, anti-fluoridation, anti-education, anti-minimum wage and pro-guns. Why, it even wants to arm university and college faculty and staff while the good Sen. Rapert wants to drop a tactical nuke in Syria. It all would be amusing if it weren't so serious. God help us.

Bill Russell

Maumelle

Israel gets a pass

Notice the White Elephant in the room? Notice the Emperor has no clothes as he addresses Congress? Notice he does not explain why it is OK for Israel to have dozens or hundreds of nuclear weapons but not OK for Iran to have any — even 10 years from now? Notice the media does not explain anything about Israel's nukes? And why the asymmetry? Why?

Robert Johnston Little Rock

[ Subscribe to the comments on this story ]

American id

After satisfying myself that Sen. Cotton really did say what he said about miscreants rotting in A.) hell, or B). Guantanamo Prison (in other words, that you guys weren't just making this stuff up), I have to say that a part of me agrees 100 percent with him.That part is called the id. It's the part of us that demands immediate gratification, the only part of our consciousness present at birth, probably located in our brain stem.

American id

After satisfying myself that Sen. Cotton really did say what he said about miscreants rotting in A.) hell, or B). Guantanamo Prison (in other words, that you guys weren't just making this stuff up), I have to say that a part of me agrees 100 percent with him.That part is called the id. It's the part of us that demands immediate gratification, the only part of our consciousness present at birth, probably located in our brain stem.

I tried to look up its exact location, but "location of Idaho" was as close as I could get. Close enough. Freud described the id as a riderless horse, which is apropos for our purposes here. Not for nothing do we have the word idiot. The Native Americans are supposed to have believed that the camera steals the soul.

Maybe "reveals" is a better word. Indulging in this kind of kill-'em-all rhetoric feels good, but in order to defeat ISIS we're going to have to re-evaluate some of our own stuff in order to avoid playing into its hands, and bilge like Cotton's is as good a place as any to start.

Mark Whitman Johnson

Little Rock

From the web in response to Michael Roberts' Eat Arkansas blog post, "We can do better, Little Rock," bemoaning Chick-fil-A ranking as 2014's highest grossing restaurant in Little Rock and encouraging readers to eat at local restaurants instead.

I think we have some excellent local restaurants and I frequent them but Chick-fil-A is delicious for fast food. Most people either don't care about their politics or they agree with them but apparently many people think the chicken is a superior product. Good luck, but I don't think you will be diminishing their sales with your rhetoric.

Andrew Branch

I avoided Chick-fil-A for nearly four years due to politics, and I regret it. Since my rediscovery of the amazing Chick-fil-A sandwich a few months ago, I eat there at least twice per week. Perhaps instead of crying about how much money Chick-fil-A makes, you should encourage local restaurants to aspire to the clear success of Chick-fil-A. The market has spoken, and Chick-fil-A rules. I do go out of my way to eat local and support local restaurants/farms. If a local restaurant had anything comparable to the deliciousness, speed, polite service and quality of a Chick-fil-A sandwich, I would eat there. But they don't.

infidel

Y'all need to stop eating factory-farmed chicken, which is all fast food. Follow one of the trucks transporting chickens to the slaughterhouse to see what winds up on your plate. The chickens are filthy dirty and some of them are obviously sick and injured.

theoutlier

I'm shocked at the Chick-fil-A defense. Really. However, as much as I try to support local businesses over chains, all this clamoring for delicious fried chicken makes me hopeful that somewhere a Bojangles exec is reading these comments and is planning to open a Famous Chicken and Biscuits restaurant here in Little Rock!

The Rank Stranger

Clearly many people on this thread know better than the common unsophisticated consumer how best to spend their hard-earned food dollars. I wonder how many of the kitchen staff at South on Main or one of the other local restaurants are able to afford to feed their family of four if they must pay $9 per chicken sandwich. Be upset all you want, but in a state with a rather low average income, places like Chick-fil-A thrive because they offer a great product at a reasonable price working people can afford. Sure it isn't locally grown hormone- free chickens that were read poetry every night before bed, but who can afford that shit on a regular basis when they support a family on $20K per year.

DrewJD

From the web, in response to Leslie Peacock's cover story, "Little Rock's flyover status grows, thanks to changes in the airline business": Even though the airport is losing money if federal subsidies are not counted, the Airport Commission made up of successful businessmen and one woman fail to run the operation as they run their businesses. Declining passengers, loss of flights, increasing expenses and salaries while revenue declines seem to offer obvious solutions. Yet they seem hell-bent on giving the airport director a larger salary and a whopping bonus. What is wrong with this stinking picture? A wholesale change in leadership seems to be the answer.

downtowner

XNA has lost flights, too. Flights to Miami, Salt Lake City, Raleigh, Memphis, D.C. and Los Angeles have been dropped or reduced. Directs to Minneapolis will continue due to the significant overlap in business between accounts dealing with both Walmart and Target keeping the planes filled.

FSMXNA

I have to fly for business. Tomorrow I catch a 9:45 flight, go to Dallas Love THEN go to New Orleans. I will not get in until 2 p.m. I have had to drive to Memphis several times to get cheaper direct flights that make the company happy but are a pain for me. Drive to Memphis, fly to destination ... work several days ... fly back to Memphis then drive back to Little Rock. Even flights out of Memphis are harder to work with. If not an international airport the regional airports are going to continue going down in the number of flights. Flying out of Little Rock is easy, few lines, quick security and relaxed, BUT if I cannot get the flights I need it is not going to matter.

Miss Ellie

From the web in response to Max Brantley's column "Little Rock's time" (Feb. 19):

To be tolerant yourself, would you not have to be tolerant of those whom you regard as intolerant? Although eliminating by law and, more importantly, by action, discrimination because of race, ethnicity, religion, and other such characteristics (please see above, regarding political points of view) is good for business, is not the better reason that practicing nondiscrimination is the right thing to do?

deadseasquirrel

From the web in response to the dining review, "Samantha's taps into new Main vibe" (Feb. 19):

The waffle. OH MY the waffle. Unlike any other waffle I've ever eaten. Likely quite dangerous that Samantha's is only a two minute walk from our front door. Love this place! They had me at PURSE HOOKS.

AshAhrens

[ Subscribe to the comments on this story ]